Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Puckett

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1860PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Randolph Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtHaksta, J.

Suit on a note, and to foreclose a mortgage. The widow, heirs and administrator of the maker of the notes, who was the mortgagor, are made defendants, together with a subsequent encumbrancer, and appellant, a subsequent purchaser of the real estate. The two latter defended separately; the other defendants were defaulted. The appellant demurred, but the demurrer was overruled. Upon this ruling error is assigned. It is insisted, that as the appellee held the notes by assignment, and, as the mortgage was not assigned, the mortgagee should have been made a party when the application was to…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Canada & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Robinson v. Springfield Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1885
  3. Reeves v. HayesIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Midland Railway Co. v. WilcoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. United States Nat. Bank v. HoltonOregon Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API