Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pinkston

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 17, 1985No. 952PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

Donald Pinkston appeals from the judgment of sentence finding him guilty of receiving stolen property, 18 Pa.C.S. Sec. 3925, and sentencing him to' a term of probation.

The facts are as follows. On November 14, 1978 David L. Gonsman burglarized the property of Mr. Ralph E. Kostolnick, located in Bedford County. Among other items, Gonsman removed a Suzuki mini-bike from a shed on the property. Eight months later, between July 23, 1979 and July 27, 1979 Gonsman burglarized the property of Mr. Paul Mark, also located in Bedford County. Gonsman removed, among other items, several…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Commonwealth v. CampanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. CampanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. HudeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. GarvinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NolanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. GrekisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. ReidSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. LaneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. HockenburySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API