Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lane

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1995No. 3491PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

The Commonwealth appeals from the Order dismissing charges of Possession with Intent to Deliver a Controlled Substance and Knowing and Intentional Possession of a Controlled Substance brought against George Lane pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 110. We reverse.

On the evening of April 29, 1992, Anthony Whiting was walking along a street in Philadelphia when two men approached him. One of these men, later identified as Appellee, placed a gun to Mr. Whiting’s side and took items from him, including a gold chain. Approximately four months later, on August 18, 1992, Mr. Whiting observed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HudeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. PinkstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WittenburgSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. GrilloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Com. v. Clark, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Com. v. Johns, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Com. v. Rosas, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API