Legal Opinion

In Re Application of Murphy

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

A fine is defined as a pecuniary punishment imposed by a lawful tribunal upon a person convicted of a crime or misdemeanor: 25 C. J. 1148.

The statute provides how the sentence of a fine may be discharged in lieu of a money payment. It states that the judgment must direct that the party be imprisoned until the fine be satisfied; that the judgment must specify the extent of the imprisonment; and that the extent of the same must not exceed one day for every $2 of the fine. It further provides that omission to specify the same shall operate to require the defendant’s imprisonment until said fine…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harlow v. ClowOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Ex parte HenshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Ex parte KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Ex Parte RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Galles v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Mayfield v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. FrancisOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Holliman v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Marquart v. MauckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API