Legal Opinion

United States v. Jenkins

United States Customs Court

Decided December 26, 1950No. 7924; Entry No. 683-K, etc.; 680-E, etcPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cole, Judge:

We are required in this proceeding to review the-decision of Cline, J., 24 Cust. Ct. 517, Reap. Dec. 7774, holding cost of production, section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (f)) to be the proper basis for appraisement of certain firebrick products. Nine items are in dispute. Following is a description of each with the value found by the trial judge. The prices set forth are in Canadian currency and based on a unit of 1,000 pieces.

[[Image here]]

There has been considerable previous litigation in this case. The trial judge, United States v. M. V. Jenkins et…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. PassavantSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. United States v. M. V. JenkinsUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  3. Jenkins v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  4. United States v. M. V. JenkinsUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  5. Horace Day Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. American Express Co.United States Customs Court · 1960
  2. United States v. North American Asbestos Corp.United States Customs Court · 1960
  3. A. Newberg & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Superior Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  5. F. W. Myers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API