Legal Opinion

Horace Day Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 17, 1912No. 249; No. 250PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstracts 23334 and 23355 (T. D. 30645).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

These cases relate to milk chocolate imported from Switzerland between April, 1907, and February, 1908, at the port of New York. *153There were numerous importations and protests, but it is agreed that the issues in all of the protests and the two cases are the same, and they were heard together.

At the' time these importations were made there was extant an agreement between certain manufacturers of milk chocolate in Switzerland, which in the record is referred to as " the conventional treaty.” We insert here so much thereof as is claimed to be applicable to the issues in these cases:

Perceiving…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Auffmordt v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. United States v. PassavantSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Robertson v. Frank Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Passavant v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. JenkinsUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  2. Shallus v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. General Commercial Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  4. United States v. MinkusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API