Legal Opinion

Koch v. Sackman-Phillips Investment Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1894No. 1339PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

— The complaint alleged that the defendants had wrongfully caused a quantity of water, sand, gravel, rocks and debris to overflow and settle upon plaintiff’s lots in the city of Seattle to his damage. Whereupon the Sackman-Phillips Investment Company answered affirmatively to the following effect: It was the owner, with one Colman, of all the lots fronting on all the streets, save one, in the Twelfth avenue addition, the said streets having been fully dedicated to the public. Desiring to have these streets graded it procured the passage of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Parke v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Burr v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Thatcher v. Lane Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Mustang Reservoir, Canal & Land Co. v. HissmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  5. Clark Lloyd Lumber Co. v. Puget Sound & Cascade Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API