Legal Opinion

State v. Sweat

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 25, 2010No. 26763Published

1Opinion of the Court

386 S.C. 339 (2010)

688 S.E.2d 569

The STATE, Petitioner,

v.

Reginald Craig SWEAT, Respondent. and

The State, Petitioner,

v.

Arthur Bryant, III, Respondent.

No. 26763.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided January 25, 2010.

Heard November 4, 2009.

General Counsel Robert E. Bogan and Assistant General Counsel Rachel D. Erwin, both of Blythewood, for petitioner.

Richard Pearce and Benjamin Moore, both of Aiken, for respondents.

R. Hawthorne Barrett and Danny C. Crowe, both of Turner, Padget, Graham & Laney, of Columbia, for Amicus Curiae Municipal Association of South Carolina.

Justice BEATTY.

This Court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pye v. Estate of Fox Ex Rel. Estate of FoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Hitachi Data Systems Corp. v. LeathermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. State v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Sloan v. South Carolina Board of Physical Therapy ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Browning Ex Rel. Estate of Browning v. HartvigsenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API