Legal Opinion

In re Appeal of the Estate of Elaine A. Holbrook, Late of Salisbury, Vermont (David Holbrook, Cheryl Holbrook and Charles Holbrook III, Appellants)

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 3, 2017No. 2016-293PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.

¶ 1. The question presented in this will contest is whether the trial court correctly determined on summary judgment that the testator intended a last will and testament which she executed on the eve of surgery to be absolute rather than contingent on her surviving the surgery. We conclude that summary judgment was premature in this case because material factual issues remained in dispute concerning the testator's intent, and therefore reverse.

¶ 2. This is the second appeal to reach the Court in this matter. In the first, In re Estate of Holbrook ( Holbrook I ), 2016 VT 13 , 201 Vt. 254 , 140…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Provost v. Fletcher Allen Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  2. Weatherhead v. StoddardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1886
  3. In Re Estate of MattisonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
  4. In re Appeal of the Estate of Elaine A. Holbrook Late of Salisbury, Vermont (David Holbrook, Cheryl Holbrook and Charles Holbrook III, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kelso v. ApplingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  2. In re Estate of SweetNevada Supreme Court · 2022
  3. In re Estate of SweetCourt of Appeals of Nevada · 2022
  4. Zlotoff Foundation Inc. NOV (2) - Decision on MotionsVermont Superior Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API