Legal Opinion

Edge v. Calhoun National Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 13, 1923No. 3573PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) ■

The claimant insists that the trial judge erred in overruling her motion for new trial, for three reasons. One is, that he erred in giving certain instructions to the jury. The second is, that he failed to give to the jury certain principles of law applicable to the issues in the case. The third is, that he erred in not holding a juror disqualified to try this case.

The claimant complains of these instructions to the jury, to wit: (1) “Now, gentlemen, I give you in charge a portion of section 3224 of the Civil Code of this State: The following acts by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wilburn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  2. Savannah Electric Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  4. Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  5. White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Driver v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Herndon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  3. Lacy v. LacyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  5. McCallie v. McCallieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API