Legal Opinion

Matter of Buford

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 28, 1979No. 60603Published

1Opinion of the Court

577 S.W.2d 809 (1979)

In the Matter of Honorable Winston V. BUFORD, Respondent.

No. 60603.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

February 28, 1979.

Rehearing Denied March 16, 1979.

James M. Smith, Counsel, Commission on Retirement, Removal and Discipline, St. Louis, Dee Wampler, Springfield, for Commission.

Thomas B. Curtis, Leland B. Curtis, David R. Hensley, Thomas E. Allen, Clayton, for respondent.

2Per curiam

This is a disciplinary proceeding brought by the Commission on Retirement, Removal and Discipline (Commission) pursuant to art. 5, sec. 27, Mo.Const., and Rule 12. Respondent is the circuit judge for the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent · Donnelly; Dissent · Rendlen.

3Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Geiler v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Spruance v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In Re HansonAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Matter of BufordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API