Legal Opinion
Kerr v. A & G Auto, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 2, 1999No. 91,756PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
¶ 1 Defendant, A & G Auto, Inc. (A & G), seeks review of the trial court’s judgment against it on Plaintiff Rodger Kerr’s claim for damages resulting from A & G’s violation of the federal Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act, 49 U.S.C.A. §§ 32701 through 32711 (West 1997 & Supp.l999)(“Odometer Act”), in A & G’s sale of á vehicle to Plaintiff. Based on our review of the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, we affirm the trial court’s decision.
¶2 It is undisputed that Plaintiff purchased a used 1993 GMC Suburban truck from A & G in November 1996. According to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sisney v. SmalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Daniel Norman Ryan v. E. W. Edwards, Jr., Tappahannock Ford, Inc., John C. Duval, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Silk v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Edward Jones, Cross-Appellant v. Hanley Dawson Cadillac Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Kahre v. KahreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Quinn v. Cherry Lane Auto Plaza, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009