Retail Store Employees Union, Local 428, Retail Clerks International v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before HUFSTEDLER and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and WHELAN, * District Judge. PER CURIAM:
The National Labor Relations Board denied the union’s claim that management was guilty of an unfair labor practice in refusing to bargain with Local 428, Retail Store Employees, and the union has petitioned for review. The Board decision, 211 N.L.R.B. No. 85, is reported at 86 L.R.R.M. 1441 (1974). We affirm.
Management’s refusal to bargain without a Board-conducted election to establish the union’s majority status occurred when a small independent union with which a county association of druggists…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Miller Redwood CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- National Labor Relations Board v. Newspapers, Inc., Publisher of the Austin American and the Austin StatesmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- National Labor Relations Board, and Graphic Arts International Union, Afl-Cio-Clc, Intervenor v. Commercial Letter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
3Cited by20 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Financial Institution Employees, Local 1182Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Local Union 204 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Affiliated With the Afl-Cio v. Iowa Electric Light and Power CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Local No. 1 (aca), Broadcast Employees of The International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Amoco Production Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- National Labor Relations Board v. Insulfab Plastics, Inc., New England DivisionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.