Legal Opinion

Levy v. David

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 11, 1902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Forcible Entry and Detainer. Heard on motion to quash proceedings, and motion granted.

1Opinion of the CourtStiness, C. J.

Upon a complaint against the respondents and others for forcibly entering and detaining the Jewish synagogue in Newport, the complainants recovered a judgment in their favor against certain respondents, under Gen. Laws. cap. 271.

The case was heard before a single judge, sitting with a jury, and the defendants against whom the judgment was rendered bring the case before us on certiorari.(1) At the trial they moved to quash the proceedings upon the ground that the complaint did not conform to the statute, Gen. Laws cap. 271, § 1, which requires that a complaint shall be made in writing and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Patterson v. GrahamIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Stolberg v. OhnmachtIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Newman v. BirdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kuykendall v. UlibarriNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API