Legal Opinion

Lenz v. Union Pacific Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1934No. 29048PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This is an action brought under the federal employers’ liability act, to recover damages for personal injuries. Aft^r plaintiff’s evidence was adduced, the trial court, on defendant’s motion, dismissed the jury and rendered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff has appealed.

Plaintiff, with others, was employed to repair defendant’s railroad tracks a short distance west of Omaha. At that place defendant has a double main line track, with a passing track between the main line tracks. The passing track is about three-fourths of a mile long. When a train moving over the main line passes cars standing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. DriggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Hoffman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Keiper v. Northwestern Pacific Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Keiper v. Northwestern Pacific Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Keiper v. Northwestern Pacific Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API