Legal Opinion

Chicago Die & Electric Co. v. Nathan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 18, 1908No. Gen. No. 13,849PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Assumpsit. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. Gemmill, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

The determination of the liability of defendant for the indebtedness set forth in the bill of particulars depends upon the fact of whether at the time the goods were ordered defendant was a partner of J. C. Feldman, his co-defendant, who, however, not being served with process, is not before the court.

A trial before the Municipal Court and a jury resulted in a verdict and judgment for $573.05 against the defendant. A new trial having been denied, this court made the writ of error sued out to operate as a supersedeas, and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fraser v. GatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Parker v. FergusIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Smith v. HulettIllinois Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Copland v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
  2. Brooks v. WatsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  3. Hudleson v. BostonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API