Legal Opinion

Copland v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 5, 1930No. 4290PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPARKS, Circuit Judge.

The facts are undisputed. In May, 1919, petitioner entered into a joint venture with Max Epstein and Elias Mayer in connection with a certain transaction relating to the sale and disposition of certain shares of capital stock of the North American Oil & Refining Corporation. In the latter part of that month the joint adventurers entered into a contract with the North American Oil & Refining Corporation for that purpose. Under the terms of the joint venture, petitioner, Max Epstein, and Elias Mayer agreed to divide any profits or bear any losses arising out of that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Telford v. PattonIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People v. CsontosIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Bing v. BowersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1927
  4. Rosenwald v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1929
  5. Martin v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bell's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  2. Apt v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1950
  3. Smith v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  4. Brainard v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. BlairCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API