Tivoli Ventures, Inc. v. Tallman
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROTHENBERG.
Defendant, Douglas Tallman, appeals the summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Tivoli Ventures, Inc. (Tivoli).
The issue before us is one of first impression in Colorado, namely: Whether a private party who is the assignee of a promissory note held by the FDIC as receiver is entitled to the benefits of the statute of limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2415 (1988). Because we hold that a private party-assignee is not so entitled, we reverse and remand with directions to enter judgment for defendant.
I
On June 26, 1981, defendant executed a promissory note in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Mountain States Financial Resources Corp. v. AgrawalDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1991
- City of Colorado Springs v. Timberlane AssociatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Thayer Insurance Agency, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- Nagy v. LandauColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter v. Roy William Bledsoe, Defendant-Counter Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Jackson v. ThweattTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Tivoli Ventures, Inc. v. BumannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Investment Co. of the Southwest v. ReeseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- WAMCO, III, Ltd. v. First Piedmont Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.