Legal Opinion

Eason v. Wheelock

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1941No. 6365PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Justice.

Action in tort for conversion of personal property. From a judgment by the district court sitting without a jury in favor of the plaintiffs for $700, defendant Wheelock appeals.

The plaintiffs and respondents, J. S. Eason, R. S. Loch-head, and Belle L. Eason are the remaining qualified officers and directors of the Builders’ Supply Company, a defunct Utah corporation. The defendants were G. H. Wheel-ock, station agent, and B. H. Decker, superintendent, Utah Division of the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company. The lower court dismissed the action as. against B. H.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Security First National Bank v. SartoriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Volker Lumber Co. v. Utah & Oregon Lumber Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Commercial Security Bank of Ogden v. Chimes PressUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. Indian Rock Bottling Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. In re Stone's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bonnie & Hyde, Inc. v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  2. Citizens Bank v. Elks Building, N.V.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Godley v. Open Grounds Farm, Inc. (In re Godley)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API