Legal Opinion

McShea v. McKenna and Ippolito

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1928No. Appeal 365PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

Two automobiles, each of which was driven by one of the defendants, collided on Broad Street and then struck the plaintiff’s car and caused the damage's to recover which this action was brought against both defendants. The allegation in the statement of claim is that both of them were negligent and that their joint act caused the injury. At the trial, the judge instructed the jury to ascertain the amount of damages and to enter a verdict for half against each defendant. In McCarthy v. DeArmit, 99 Pa. 63, it is stated, “In trespass all the defendants are alike guilty,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. De ArmitSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  2. Goldman v. Mitchell-Fletcher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Seither v. Philad. Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  4. McLaughlin v. MonaghanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Peterson v. WigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MacHolme v. CochenourSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Bausewine v. Strassburger, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1943
  3. Shearer v. Rasbridge, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API