Legal Opinion

Rissi v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 15, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00267Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EMILY DOCKHAM RISSI, an Case No.: 24-cv-00267-AJB-KSC individual, 12 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT 13 Plaintiff, NEXTGEN GLOBAL RESOURCES, LLC’S MOTION TO COMPEL 14 v. ARBITRATION 15 T-MOBILE USA, INC., a Delaware (Doc. No. 16) 16 Corporation; NextGen Global Resources, 17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; KINETICOM, INC., a Delaware 18 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 20, 19 inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 Before the Court is Defendant NextGen Global Resources, LLC’s (“NextGen” or 24 “Defendant”) motion…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API