Legal Opinion
Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen International Distribution Ltd.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 26, 2011No. 06-cv-1446 (ADS)(ETB)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
After a seven week trial, the jury in this case found that the defendants had infringed claims 1 through 7 and 9 of United States Patent No. 5,577,618 (“the '618 patent”), which is held by the plaintiff, Metso Minerals, Inc. (“Metso Minerals”). The plaintiff now moves to permanently enjoin the defendants from engaging in activity that infringes the '618 patent. For the reasons that follow, the Court grants this motion.
I. BACKGROUND
The Court described the background of the '618 patent in detail in its previous decision in this case, Metso…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Oakley, Inc. v. Sunglass Hut International, Lenscrafters, Inc., Ray Ban Sun Optics, Luxottica Group S.P.A., and Leonardo Del VecchioCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Verizon Services Corp. v. Vonage Holdings Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Praxair, Inc. v. Atmi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- ActiveVideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- Canon, Inc. v. Color Imaging, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
- Tools Aviation, LLC v. Digital Pavilion Electronics LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Wirtgen America, Inc. v. Caterpillar, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2024