Legal Opinion
Matthew Headley v. McCleary, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 19, 2006No. 05-2122, 05-2123PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
This case involves an agreement to distribute Guy’s brand snacks gone bad. McCleary, Inc. (McCleary), appeals from a judgment in the amount of $6.45 million rendered in favor of Matthew Headley Holdings, LLC (hereinafter Heartland), on Heartland’s fraud and breach of contract claims. McCleary raises numerous issues on appeal, only three of which require resolution: (1) whether the district court erred in admitting testimony and exhibits from Heartland’s expert witness on damages, (2) whether the verdict and the jury instructions correspond to the state of Missouri…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Fred Lauzon v. Senco Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Vicki CROSS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emanuel CLEAVER II, Et Al., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Ralph L. Gray, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. O. Gene Bicknell, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dan Margolies Movant Below, Matthew Headley Holdings, Llc, Doing Business as Heartland Snacks, Formerly Known as Incito Capital Group v. McCleary Inc. Charles Patrick McCleary Jerry Stokely Dan Margolies Movant Below, Matthew Headley Holdings, Llc, Doing Business as Heartland Snacks, Formerly Known as Incito Capital Group v. McCleary Inc. Charles Patrick McCleary Jerry StokelyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Bierman v. Target CorporationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024