Legal Opinion

Manalapan Mining Co., Inc. v. Lunsford

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 2006No. 2005-SC-0626-WC, 2005-SC-0628-WCPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

At issue in this appeal is the application of KRS 342.185 to a hearing loss claim that was filed more than two years after the hazardous noise exposure ceased. An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) determined that a rule of discovery applied and that the claim was timely because the worker filed it within two years after a physician informed him that his condition was work-related. The Workers’ Compensation *602Board (Board) construed KRS 342.185 as barring a claim filed more than two years after the date of last exposure and reversed. Convinced that KRS 342.185 does not operate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haycraft v. Corhart Refractories Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Alcan Foil Products v. HuffKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Special Fund v. ClarkKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Hill v. Sextet Mining Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Coslow v. General Electric Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Risor v. Nebraska BoilerNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Osie Daniel Goodgame Jr v. Consol of Kentucky, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Consol of Kentucky, Inc. v. Osie Daniel Goodgame JrKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Consol of Kentucky, Inc. v. Osie Daniel Goodgame JrKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings v. Genevieve NobleKentucky Supreme Court · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API