Legal Opinion

Aatrix Software, Inc. v. Green Shades Software, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 31, 2018No. 2017-1452PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Per curiam

*1355 Appellee Green Shades Software, Inc. filed a petition for rehearing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by Appellant Aatrix Software, Inc. The petition and response were first referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter, to the circuit judges who are in regular active service. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That :

1) The petition for panel rehearing is denied.

2) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

3) The mandate of the court will issue on June 7, 2018.

2Concurrence · MooreMoore, Circuit Judge, joined by Dyk, O'Malley, Taranto, and Stoll, Circuit Judges,

Berkheimer and Aatrix stand for…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Lourie; Dissent.

3Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  5. Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by46 opinions

  1. Huawei Techs., Co. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. Epic IP LLC v. Backblaze, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2018
  3. In re Biogen 755 Patent Litig.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
  4. Citrix Sys., Inc. v. Avi Networks, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
  5. First-Class Monitoring, LLC v. United Parcel Serv. of Am., Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2019

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API