Legal Opinion

In re the Disbarment of Luce

California Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1890No. 20534PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Application of August Heilbronner for disbarment of M. A. Luce, J. W. McDonald, and E. S. Torrance, as attorneys at law, for alleged unprofessional conduct. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

This is an application made and filed by August Heilbronner .for the disbarment of the above-named defendants, composing the law firm of Luce, McDonald & Torrance, attorneys at San Diego. The record is very voluminous, consisting of some eight hundred pages of testimony and about three hundred pages of printed argument. A careful examination of the entire matter reveals the fact that the proceeding is one of many instituted under both the civil and the criminal law in the course of a bitter contest between Heilbronner, a creditor, and K. C. Naylor of San Diego, an insolvent debtor. Very much…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Farmers' & Merchants' National Bank v. MosherNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Hay v. DuskinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  3. Browne v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. James v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. In re Muller & KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API