Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stewart v. Van Noy

California Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1968No. S. F. No. 22584Published

1DissentMcCOMB, J.

I dissent. The issue for our determination is whether property devised by the will of the last survivor of a mutual will made pursuant to a written contract is included as part of decedent’s estate for the purpose of computing the surviving spouse’s share pursuant to section 70 of the Probate Code.

It is appellants’ position that decedent’s estate is limited by the consequences of his contract and that the surviving spouse’s rights operate only on the property not subject to the contract.

Section 70 of the Probate Code reads: “If a person marries after making a will, and the spouse survives the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Owens v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Rubin v. Irving Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API