Legal Opinion
State v. Moultrie
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided October 31, 1994No. 2252PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Goolsby, Judge:
David Moultrie appeals his conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. He claims the trial court should have excluded evidence that he alleges the arresting officer improperly seized during a search of his person and testimony concerning his prior drug-related activities. We affirm.
On June 15,1991, Ricky Dean Fabre gave Deputies Joseph Boykin and Ronald Maugans a detailed account of drug trans actions involving cocaine, crack cocaine, and marijuana that Moultrie regularly conducted in front of his house since 1989. Fabre acquired the information that he…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- State v. FreiburgerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- State v. RaffaldtSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- State v. StanleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.