Legal Opinion
Richard S. Simpson v. Union Oil Company of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 2, 1963No. 17308PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, District Judge.
This private antitrust case for damages was decided on motion for summary judgment in favor of appellee, Union Oil Company of California, hereinafter called Union, and against appellant, hereinafter called Simpson. Generally, it raises the issues of (1) interstate commerce, (2) violation of the antitrust laws and liability of Union, and (3) actionable damage suffered by the plaintiff.
We assume for the purpose of this decision, but expressly refrain from deciding, that there were triable issues of price fixing, 1 2exclusive dealing, 2 the effect of the McGuire…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Paul Lessig v. Tidewater Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- The Elder-Beerman Stores Corp. v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Richard S. Simpson v. Union Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.