Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hertel

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County

Decided September 6, 1972No. 72 — 10,106Published

1Opinion of the Court

GREEVY, P. J.,

Following his conviction by a jury of fornication and bastardy, John Hertel, defendant, filed motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial.

Noreen Smith, the prosecutrix, testified that she had intercourse with defendant five times from September 5 or 6, 1970, through the first week of October 1970, and with another man “the end of October 1970.” The child was born June 30, 1971.

DISCUSSION

The court will first consider the motion in arrest of judgment as it applies to the bastardy charge.

“We are not unmindful of the standard to be applied in considering a motion in arrest of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TabbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Commonwealth v. HazlettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Commonwealth v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Commonwealth v. HarbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Commonwealth v. RednockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API