Legal Opinion

Paul v. Howland Towing & Transportation Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 6, 1926No. 107PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, District Judge.

Claimant’s tug, Clarence P. Howland, bad in tow libelants’ four-masted schooner Charles Struven. The tug was 85 feet long and the schooner 170 feet long, carrying a cargo of 575,000 feet of lumber. The tag was on the port after quarter of the schooner, and had brought her to a point near the foot of Van Brunt Street, Brooklyn, with the purpose of placing her starboard side to the pier at the Beard Stores. When the schooner was at a distance from the pier variously estimated by the witnesses at from 25 to 175 feet, the master of the tug, who was at the time on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The W. G. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
  2. Kiernan v. Lake Champlain Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The Clarence P. HowlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  2. Tisbury Towing & Transportation Co. v. Tug VENUSCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API