Legal Opinion

Reno Tamalini v. Belinda Stewart

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 8, 2001No. 99-35888PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROTT, Circuit Judge:

The Washington Court of Appeals appointed new counsel to represent convicted defendant Reno Tamalini while his appeal was pending despite Tamalini’s Sixth Amendment objection to the substitution, and despite his original court-appointed appellate lawyer’s willingness to continue pro bono. In this appeal, we must decide two issues: first, whether we have jurisdiction to entertain a challenge predicated upon the Fourteenth Amendment; and second, whether these circumstances violated Tamalini’s rights under the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution.

We have appellate…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Frank Loher v. Todd ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Date v. SchriroDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008
  3. State v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Celaya v. StewartDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2010
  5. Frank Loher v. Todd ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API