Nutt v. Codington
Supreme Court of Florida
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the ■court.
1Opinion of the Court
Mabry, J.:
A bill in chancery was filed by appellant against appellees, and it alleges, in substance, that in September, 1886, Nutt entered into a contract with E. W. Coding-ton, agent for his wife, Anna Y. Codington, through A. E. Pooser, contractor, to furnish material and do the work necessary in plastering a certain dwelling-house situated on Moral avenue, in the town of Bar-tow. It is alleged that the house and lot on which it rs located belonged to Mrs. Codington; that the contract for said plastering was fully complied with and completed in the month of January, 1887, and that there was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Garvin v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
- Thrasher v. DoigSupreme Court of Florida · 1882
- Schnabel v. BettsSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
- O'Neil v. PercivalSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
- Blumer v. Pollak & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- M. J. Hoffman Construction Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Clarkson v. Louderback, Gilbert & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1895
- Smith, Et Vir. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- London Operating Co. v. Continental Construction Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
- St. Petersburg Lumber Co. v. RisleySupreme Court of Florida · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.