Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Brabson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 30, 1998No. 1309-95Published

1ConcurrenceWomack, Judge

Although I join the Court’s opinion, I would like to devote more attention to the question of privity.

The doctrine of mutuality of estoppel now requires that the party who is to be estopped by a prior judgment be a party who was bound by the prior judgment, or one of that party’s privies. Eagle Properties, Ltd. v. Scharbauer, 807 S.W.2d 714, 721 (Tex.1990). One question in this case is whether the plaintiff in this case was a party to, or in privity with a party to, the administrative license revocation proceeding. I believe that, because of the fractured nature of Texas government, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Eagle Properties, Ltd. v. ScharbauerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Public Utility Com'n of Texas v. CoferTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. FritzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API