Legal Opinion

Scull v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 1989No. 86-1477PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Associate Judge:

Appellant Alberto Crespo Scull was allegedly one of two protagonists in a shootout. At his first trial, a jury found him guilty of jumping bail, but was unable to return a verdict on several other counts. At a second trial, a jury found him guilty of two counts of assault with a dangerous weapon and of carrying a pistol without a license, but acquitted him of two counts of assault with intent to kill while armed. On this appeal, Scull urges that by denying his request to cross-examine witnesses as to their motive for testifying, the trial court abridged his Sixth…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. McGrier v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Newman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Clayborne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. State v. James Edward S.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Clark v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API