Legal Opinion

Hertz Washmobile System v. Village of South Orange

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 21, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

25 N.J. 207 (1957)

135 A.2d 524

HERTZ WASHMOBILE SYSTEM, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

THE VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 9, 1957.

Argued September 16, 1957.

Decided October 21, 1957.

Mr. Ward J. Herbert argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Messrs. McCarter, English & Studer, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph M. Jacobs argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Stoffer & Jacobs, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by BURLING, J.

The Village of South…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fred v. Mayor and Council, Old Tappan BoroughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  2. Gundaker Central Motors, Inc. v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  3. Auto-Rite Supply Co. v. Mayor of WoodbridgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  4. Hart v. Township of TeaneckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
  5. Sherman v. Mayor of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Masters-Jersey, Inc. v. MAYOR AND GENERAL COUNCIL OF PARAMUSSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API