Legal Opinion

Geeslin v. On-Line Information Services, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 8, 2015No. 1120666Published

1Opinion of the Court

MURDOCK, Justice.

Kevin Geeslin filed this action challenging a “convenience fee” and “token fee” charged in connection with his on-line electronic filing of a civil action — fees assessed in addition to the statutorily defined filing fee that were mandated by a September 6, 2012, administrative order issued by then Chief Justice Charles Malone. That order purported to make mandatory the on-line, or electronic, filing of all documents filed in civil actions in Alabama circuit courts and district courts by parties represented by an attorney. Alabama’s on-line document-filing system, known as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tucker v. NicholsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Ex Parte State Ex Rel. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. State of Alabama Department of Transportation v. Pace Reid.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API