Legal Opinion
Chrysler Motors v. Royal Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 15, 1946No. Civ. 15170PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KINCAID, J. pro tem.
In this action separate appeals have been taken by Chrysler Motors of California, a corporation, hereinafter called “Chrysler,” from the judgment in favor of defendant Royal Indemnity Company, a corporation, hereinafter called “Royal,” on the complaint and answer herein, and by Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a corporation, hereinafter called “Hartford,” from the judgment in favor of Royal on its cross-complaint and the answer thereto.
Prior to the commencement of this action Royal and Hartford each issued a liability policy of insurance to Chrysler. Following the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thompson-Starrett Co. v. Otis Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- St. Louis Dressed Beef & Provision Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Lamb v. Belt Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Butler Bros. v. American Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Gulf Portland Cement Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ritchie v. Anchor Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Walters v. American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Columbia Southern Chemical Corp. v. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- McNeilab, Inc. v. North River InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.