Cheney v. . Arnold
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff, Phila Cheney, claims to be the daughter of Charles Harris, who is admitted to have been seized of the premises, claimed in this action, and she seeks to recover as his heir. The defendant claims under a conveyance from her mother, Betsey Pike, formerly Betsey Harris; and he insists that the plaintiff is not the legitimate daughter of Charles Harris, and cannot therefore inherit from him, though it is not denied that she is his natural daughter.
Upon the question of the plaintiff's legitimacy there was no room for controversy about the facts. It was proved by the plaintiff's own…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fenton v. ReedNew York Supreme Court · 1809
- Rose v. ClarkNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
- Jackson, ex rel. Dies v. WinneNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Gillet v. MeadNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Brownell v. McEwenNew York Supreme Court · 1848
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Hutchins v. KimmellMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Cartwright v. McGownIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Caujolle v. . FerrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Estate of MurdockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- People Ex Rel. Scharff v. . FrostNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.