LeBlanc v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development, Office of Highways
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
CALOGERO, Chief Justice.*
We consider in this inverse condemnation case whether restricted access to property with accompanying reduction in property value and temporary loss of business income triggers the entitlement to compensable damages. Concluding that it does not, we *1153reverse the decisions of the District Court and the Court of Appeal, which awarded damages and attorney’s fees to plaintiffs, 615 So.2d 365 (1993).
In the late 1970’s, the Office of Highways of the Department of Transportation and Development for the State of Louisiana (“DOTD”) sought to reconstruct the westbound 1-10 exit…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reymond v. State Ex Rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
- State Through DOTD v. Chambers Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- STATE, DOTD v. DietrichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Rudolph Ramelli, Inc. v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
- Harrington v. Southwestern Elec. Power Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Avenal v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Williams v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
- Barrilleaux v. NPC, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Estate of Patout v. City of New IberiaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
- Holzenthal v. Sewerage & Water Board of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.