Legal Opinion

Patton v. D. Rhodes, Ltd.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 24, 1988No. 5-87-0074PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lewis

The plaintiff, Arlene Patton, as administrator of the estate of Gilbert C. Patton, deceased, brought suit against defendants, D. Rhodes, Ltd., and Moritz Corporation, under section 6 — 21 of the Dramshop Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 43, par. 135). The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $62,000, which was reduced because of statutory limitations to $26,374.50. The dramshop defendants filed a post-trial motion to reduce damages, praying that the judgment be reduced to zero by virtue of crediting a $100,000 wrongful death settlement from the driver of the other…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. De Lude v. RimekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1953
  2. Aldridge v. MorrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949
  3. Robertson v. WhiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  4. Slone v. MortonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  5. Kurth v. Amee, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Muranyi v. Turn Verein Frisch-AufAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. Tralmer v. Soztneps, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. Chuttke v. FresenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  4. Muranyi v. Turn Verein Frisch-AufAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API