Harris v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRIST, Judge.
Movant was convicted by a jury of robbery in the first degree by means of a dangerous and deadly weapon. His conviction was affirmed on appeal in State v. Harris, 571 S.W.2d 443 (Mo.App.1978). Movant then filed this Rule 27.26 motion in which he challenged the effectiveness of his trial counsel. He was accorded an eviden-tiary hearing. The court below overruled the motion. Movant appeals.
We must affirm the ruling of the Rule 27.26 judge unless it appears his findings, conclusions, or judgment are clearly erroneous. King v. State, 592 S.W.2d 262, 263 (Mo.App.1979). In order to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- Shoemake v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- State v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- McCoy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- King v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. WoollenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982