Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. Rink

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 1886PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to the Common Pleas, No. 3, of Philadelphia County to review a judgment for plaintiff.

1Per curiam

In the contest between Barr and the defendant in error, the court below decreed that at the election held on the third Tuesday of February, 1880, the latter received the highest number of votes, and was duly and legally elected a magistrate in and for said city of Philadelphia. That decree was affirmed in this court. Thereupon he was duly commissioned by the governor to be a magistrate of said city, and giving and granting unto him full right and title inter alia, “to receive and to enjoy all and singular the emoluments to a magistrate lawfully belonging or in any wise appertaining, by virtue…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Selby v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Rasmussen v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Furmanski v. IwanowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Tanner v. EdwardsUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Reed v. SloanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API