Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Shanklin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1884No. 11,227PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

The appellee brought this action against the appellant to recover the value of two horses killed by the appellant’s train of cars on the line of its railway.

A demurrer to the complaint, for want of facts sufficient, was overruled. The defendant answered in two paragraphs:

1. The general denial. . 2. That at the place where the horses entered upon the railway the defendant could not lawfully fence its road, because there was a public highway there. The plaintiff replied, denying the second defence. The issues were tried by a jury, who returned a verdict for the plaintiff for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi R. W. Co. v. CollarnIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Wabash Railway Co. v. ForsheeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis-Railroad v. O'ConnorIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Cooper v. RobertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HughesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ShanklinIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Croy v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Banister v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API