Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Olsen v. Country Club Sports, Inc.

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1986No. 15659Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBakes, Acting Chief Judge

I concur in the majority’s affirming the trial court’s finding that a surrender has occurred. However, the trial court’s finding that the surrender occurred on August 29, 1981, is not clearly erroneous, I.R.C.P. 52(a), and should be affirmed. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent to Parts II, III and V of the majority opinion.

The majority correctly states the law of surrender of a leasehold, but then proceeds to cloud the principles of surrender by talking in terms of forfeiture and termination of the lease. Therefore, I feel it necessary to restate the principles of law concerning surrender,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Riggs v. MurdockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Gordon v. Consolidated Sun Ray, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. Kennedy v. NelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Sanden v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Coffin v. FowlerAlaska Supreme Court · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API