Legal Opinion

Virgilio v. Motorola, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 30, 2004No. 03 Civ. 10156(AKH)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HAIGHT, Senior District Judge.

This Opinion expands upon and amplifies a ruling by this Court in the above captioned matter delivered from the bench on January 22, 2004.

I. BACKGROUND

The original complaint in this case was filed on December 22, 2003 and was subsequently assigned to the calendar of Judge Berman by lot. Time allotted to the City of New York, the only defendant named in the original complaint, to answer had not yet elapsed when local counsel for Plaintiffs addressed and personally delivered to Judge Berman, on January 13, 2003, a letter bearing that date. In…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Virgilio v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Virgilio v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. Dolan v. RothDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004
  4. Redd v. McDowell County Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2013
  5. Apex Construction Company, Inc v. USVIDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API