Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kostka

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 17, 2015No. SJC 11766PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuffly, J.

The Commonwealth seeks to compel Christopher Kostka 1 to provide a saliva sample from which it may obtain Christopher’s deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). The Commonwealth filed a motion in the Superior Court to compel the taking of a saliva sample, arguing that a DNA sample is necessary in order to determine whether Christopher is the identical or fraternal twin of his brother, Timothy Kostka, who has been indicted on charges of murder in the first degree and armed home invasion. 2 Christopher is not a suspect in that case. A judge of the Superior Court allowed the Commonwealth’s motion and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. CurninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. Silva-SantiagoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  4. Green v. RichmondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. BarbosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. IN RE GRAND JURY WITNESS G.B. v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. IN RE GRAND JURY WITNESS G.B. v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API