Grant v. Cronin
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
The issue, whether the city of Janesville should pay interest upon the condemnation award, arises oh motions for summary judgment made by both the defendants and the plaintiff. Neither in the trial court nor in the arguments and briefs before this court has any factual issue been raised which would require a trial. Only a question of law is presented.
Interest on an award of condemnation should be paid when payment is withheld beyond the time the property is actually taken. Sec. 13, art. I, Const., provides that the property of no person shall be taken for public use without just compensa tion…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Appleton Water Works Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Stolze v. Milwaukee & Lake Winnebago RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Neilson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- W.H. Pugh Coal Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- Wisconsin Retired Teachers Ass'n v. Employe Trust Funds BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- South Carolina Department of Transportation v. FaulkenberryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- Grunwaldt v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963