Bell v. Radford
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Fond du Lac County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The plaintiff had a verdict for $130.50; a motion for a new trial was denied; and defendant appealed from the judgment on the verdict.
1Opinion of the CourtCole, C. J.
The' plaintiff brought this action to recover an unpaid balance of $100, which he claims is due on a sale of a span of horses to the defendant. The plaintiff’s contention is that he sold the horses to the defendant for $300; that in addition it was understood that the defendant •was to take them to .Dakota and sell them for the best price he could obtain, and pay over one half of what the horses should sell for above the contract price. This is the plaintiff’s version of the contract. The defendant’s version is that in March, 1882, he, then being a resident of Dakota, was at Fond du Lac, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Valley Lumber Co. v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anderson v. Arpin Hardwood Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Mygatt v. TarbellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Oliver v. MorawetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897