Legal Opinion

American Home Assurance Co. v. Republic Insurance

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 4, 1994No. 90 Civ. 4095(MEL)Published

1Opinion of the Court

LASKER, District Judge.

Defendants move for sanctions against American Home and its attorneys pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants assert that American Home “brought and prosecuted a wholly meritless claim with no basis in law” because the legal argument advanced by American Home — that an excess carrier must show prejudice when basing a defense on untimely notice — was not “warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law.” Fed. R.Civ.P. Rule 11(b)(2).

American…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Security Mutual Insurance v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Olin Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  3. Unigard Security Insurance v. North River InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. American Home Assurance Company v. Republic Insurance Company and United National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. Unigard Security Insurance v. North River InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API